Stalin: The withdrawal does not mean the Soviet Union refused to help China, if help needed. The pr

Healthy davos Living Social Political Education International Travel The World is Flat Oil - Money - Power Profile - Events Military Technical Economics Economic Forum marketplace Consumer Protection business Portrait East China Sea Korea illegally seized davos the Paracel Sea - Fishing Hot Spots of the World Paracel - Changsha Naval War-climax secret military art in the eastern South China Sea seabed beloved Report - Investigation of long-term Stories France The Spotlight Conversation law school and the Cultural Civil cultural problem Backstage Conversation weekend Entertainment Military and War Petrovietnam Oil and Gas Association VN
(Petrotimes) - Minutes of the conversation between Mr. IVStalin and Chairman Mao Zedong in the presence of Comrade Molotov, Malenkov, Bunganin, Vishinski. Russian translator is Fedorenko; Chinese interpreter Shi Zhe is. After greetings and discuss common issues, took place the following conversation:
Mao Zedong: The most important thing now is to establish peace, China needs about 3-5 years of peace to be able to put the economy back to pre-war levels and stabilize the country in general. Decide on the most important issues in China now depends on the prospects of a peaceful future. Therefore, the Party Central Committee assigned me the task consult comrades. Comrade Stalin, world peace can be maintained for how long and how?
Stalin: In China and the ongoing davos war for peace, the Soviet Union is also interested in issues of peace, even though we had 4 years of peace. For China currently does not have any immediate threat: Japan must restore should be ready for war. America, davos though cheered the US war in fact afraid of war. In fact, no one to fight with China.
Stalin: We can discuss and decide the issue. We must determine whether to declare continue current davos 1945 Treaty of alliance and friendship between the Soviet Union and China (signed between the Soviet Union and the Kuomintang government - ND) and will be announced later changes needed, davos or make changes now, change immediately or not?
As comrades know, the Treaty was signed davos between the Soviet Union and China under the Yalta Agreement. The main points of the treaty (Kuril Islands issue, southern Sakhalin, Port Arthur ...) is content Yalta Agreement. This means that the agreement was signed with the consent of the UK and the US. In this context, our internal meeting today and decided davos not to modify any provision, even change a termination would give the US and UK have legal grounds to reset adjustment problems the terms of the agreements related davos to the Kuril Islands, southern davos Sakhalin ... Therefore, we sought to adjust the treaty davos in fact, while still maintaining the official Soviet authorities stationed in Port Arthur, and Also, at the request of the Chinese government, will withdraw Soviet troops currently stationed there. One such work can proceed at the request of China. There may also do so with Changchun Railway runs China's Manchuria - ie adjusted substantially corresponding points while maintaining its terms. On the other hand, if the Chinese comrades are not satisfied with this strategy, the comrades may raise its own proposal.
Mao Zedong: The current situation of Changchun Railway and Port Arthur is consistent with the interests of China, because China's military davos was not strong enough to fight against imperialist aggression effectively. Moreover, Changchun Railway is the training of personnel and industrial railways in China.
Stalin: The withdrawal does not mean the Soviet Union refused to help China, if help needed. The problem is that we, the Communists, uncomfortable with the troops overseas, especially in the land of a nation you. In that situation, anyone can say that, if the Soviet military might stationed on Chinese soil, so why I can not play their troops in Hong Kong and the United States played in Tokyo?
We can benefit greatly on the forum of international relations if there is general agreement, Soviet troops would withdraw from Port Arthur. Moreover, the withdrawal of Soviet troops would enhance China's position in relation to the bourgeois nationalism. Anyone can see that the Communists have achieved what Kuomintang leader Chiang Kai-shek could not do it. The Chinese Communists have to take the bourgeoisie nation. Treaty rights to the Soviet Union stationed in Port Arthur, but the Soviet Union has no obligation to exercise the right of withdrawal, and may at the request of China. However, if this does not fit, Soviet troops in Port Arthur can play in that 2 to 5 years or 10 years, any time that is suitable for China. Do not let them misunderstood as we run out of China. We can be there even 20 years.